Skip to main content

High Court cannot dismiss an appeal on merits in the absence of the counsel, SC reiterates.


Indian Supreme Court Postpones Crypto Case to November, New Date Confirmed

       On Friday The Supreme Court held that High Courts do not have the power to dismiss an appeal on merits if the counsel for the appellant does not appear to argue the matter.
A bench comprising of Justices S. Abdul Nazeer and Sanjiv Khanna clarified that,
 “... if the appellant does not appear, the Court may if it deems fit dismiss the appeal for default of appearance but it does not have the power to dismiss the appeal on merits.
Factual Background
In the instant case, the plaintiffs filed a suit or declaration of   title, recovery of possession and mesne profits before the Trial Court. However, the Trial Court dismissed the suit.
Aggrieved by the order, the plaintiffs filed an appeal before the Additional District Judge. The District Judge set aside the Trial Court judgement,  allowed the suit and declared the plaintiffs as owners of the disputed land.
This judgment of the District Court was challenged by the defendants before the Guwahati High Court.  When the matter was taken up for hearing by the High Court, the  counsel for the appellants (original defendants) was not present to argue the matter. However, the High Court went on to decide the appeal on merits and later, dismissed the appeal. This act on the part of the High Court was challenged by the defendants in an appeal before the Supreme Court.
What the Supreme Court held
The sole contention that was argued by the appellants is that the High Court was not justified in dismissing the appeal on merits in the absence of the counsel.
The counsel for the appellant further relied on the explanation under Order 41 Rule 17(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) which states that the Court cannot dismiss an appeal on merits when the appellant remains absent on the date fixed for hearing.
In addition to taking serious note of the above, the Apex Court further relied on the judgements in Abdur Rahman and others  v. Athifa Begum and others  and  Ghanshyam Dass Gupta  v. Makhan Lal.
In the latter, the Supreme Court had held,
“Consequently,   the Explanation to sub¬rule (1) of Rule 17 of Order 41 CPC was added by Act 104 of 1976, making it explicit that nothing in sub-rule (1) of Rule 17 of Order 41 CPC should be   construed   as   empowering   the   appellate   court   to dismiss   the   appeal   on   merits   where   the   appellant remained absent or left unrepresented on the day fixed for hearing the appeal. The reason for introduction of such an Explanation is due to the fact that it gives an opportunity to the appellant to convince the appellate court that there was sufficient cause for non¬appearance. Such   an   opportunity   is   lost,  if   the   courts   decide   the appeal   on   merits   in   absence   of   the   counsel   for   the appellant.”
In view of the above, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s order stating that “This order has been made clearly in contravention of Rule 17(1) of Order XLI of the CPC”. The Apex Court further directed that the matter be remitted to the Guwhati High Court for a fresh disposal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reasons and Rectification of Defective Return Notice U/S 139 (9)

Meaning :  Section 139 of the income tax Act, 1961 has provided the limit for every type of assessee who is required to file an income tax return. For filing of the return, every person should comply with the income tax act. Although if he made certain mistakes while filing the return then such return shall be deemed as defective return. In this article, we will discuss all those cases in which a return shall be called a defective return and how to deal with such a  defective return notice . A return shall be considered as a defective return unless it has contained all the following documents : Return in the Prescribed form:  Department has specified the income tax form as per the type of income and type of assesse. For example: if the person is having a salary income only then he is required to file ITR-1 if he has filed his return in any other form, then such return shall be considered as defective return.   Statement of computation of tax payable: ...

TAN Application Online- Procedure of online TAN application

TAN refers to the Tax Deduction Account Number or Tax Collection Account Number. It is a 10 digit alphanumeric number. It can be applied online or offline, the procedure for the new application of TAN is different in both cases but the documentation is the same. In this post, we will discuss the procedure to make the TAN application online. TAN Application Online How to apply TAN online Applicants need to follow the below mention steps- Step 1-  Visit NSDL website or  click here  to visit. Step 2-  At the bottom go to apply for a new TAN and select from the dropdown ‘category of Deductors’ Step 3-  On doing so the applicant is redirected to Form 49B. Step 4-  Fill in the given form. Step 5-  Click Submit Step 6-  On Confirmation, the acknowledgment screen is displayed which contains the following 14-Digit acknowledgment number Name of the applicant Status of the applicant Contact details Payment Details Space for Signature Step 7- ...

How To Get An Old Income Tax Refund?

As we all know if we had paid excess taxes than our income tax liability either by TDS/ TCS or in the form of Advance Tax, we can claim the refund of such excess tax paid by filing Income Tax Return u/s 139. The last date of filing of Income Tax Returns u/s 139(1) is July 31st of the relevant Assessment Year. However, Belated return can be filed under section 139(4) by the end of the relevant assessment year i.e. 31st March. So, if you want to claim a refund of the excess taxes paid, you must file your ITR maximum by 31st March to avoid the loss of your refund. But, there are many cases where the assessee missed this second deadline also and struggling to get their refund from the department. So, In this article, we will discuss in detail how you can get your old  Income Tax Refund  related to the previous year. Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 119(2)(b) confers the power to Central Board of Direct Taxes by which board if c...